Did You Know Just That Many Cancers Are Linked To A Vitamin Deficiency?
This article is
about the nutrient; for other uses see Vitamin C (disambiguation).
For information on the chemical properties of the molecule,
see ascorbic acid.
3D representation of vitamin C
Chemical structure of vitamin CVitamin C is a water-soluble
nutrient and vitamin essential for life and for maintaining
optimal health. It is also known by its chemical name ascorbic
acid. It is used by the body for many purposes.
Almost
all animals and plants synthesize their own vitamin C. There
are some exceptions, such as humans and a small number of
other animals, including, apes, guinea pigs, the red-vented
bulbul, a fruit-eating bat and a species of trout. This
has led a some scientists, including Linus Pauling to hypothesize
that these species either lost (or never had) the ability
to produce their own Vitamin C, and that if their diets
were supplemented with an amount of the nutrient proportional
to the amount produced in animal species that do synthesize
their own Vitamin C, better health would result.
Vitamin
C was first isolated in 1928, and in 1932 it was proved
to be the agent which prevents scurvy. Albert Szent-Györgyi
was awarded the 1937 Nobel Prize in Medicine for this feat.
Vitamin
C is a weak acid, called ascorbic acid or a salt ascorbate.
It is the L-enantiomer of ascorbic acid The D-enantiomer
shows no biological activity. Both are mirror image forms
of the same chemical molecular structure, see optical isomers).
The
active part of the substance is the ascorbate ion, which
can express itself as either an acid or a salt of ascorbate
that is neutral or slightly basic. Commercial vitamin C
is often a mix of ascorbic acid, sodium ascorbate and/or
other ascorbates. Some supplements contain in part the D-enantiomer,
which is useless and harmless. See the ascorbic acid article
for a full description of the molecule's chemical properties.
Contents
[hide]
1 Functions in the body
2 Vitamin C deficiency
2.1 Acute scurvy
3 Daily requirements and dose dependant effects
3.1 Government agency recommended intake levels
3.2 Independent dose recommendations
3.3 Therapeutic applications and doses
3.3.1 Heart disease
3.3.2 Viral diseases, and poisons
3.3.3 Lead poisoning
3.3.4 Cancer
3.3.5 Cataracts
4 Other effects
4.1 Contraindications
4.2 Side-effects
4.3 Alleged harmful effects
5 Sources of vitamin C
5.1 Plant sources
5.2 Animal sources
5.3 Food preparation
5.4 Vitamin C supplements
5.5 Methods of manufacture (artificial chemical synthesis)
6 Discovery and history
7 Vitamin C hypothesis
7.1 Chronic scurvy
8 Politics of Vitamin C
9 See also
10 Sources
11 References
12 Books
13 External links
Functions in the body
As a participant in hydroxylation, vitamin C is needed for
the production of collagen in the connective tissue. These
fibers are ubiquitous throughout the body, providing firm
but flexible structure. Some tissues have a greater percentage
of collagen, especially: skin, mucous membranes, teeth and
bones.
Vitamin C is required for synthesis of dopamine, noradrenaline
and adrenaline in the nervous system or in the adrenal glands.
Vitamin C is also needed to synthesize carnitine, important
in the transfer of energy to the cell mitochondria.
The tissues with greatest percentage of vitamin C — over
100 times the level in blood plasma — are the adrenal glands,
pituitary, thymus, corpus luteum, and retina.
The brain, spleen, lung, testicle, lymph nodes, liver, thyroid,
small intestinal mucosa, leukocytes, pancreas, kidney and
salivary glands usually have 10 to 50 times the concentration
present in plasma.
Vitamin C is a antioxidant.
Vitamin
C deficiency
No bodily organ stores ascorbate as a primary function,
and so the body soon depletes itself of ascorbate if fresh
supplies are not consumed through the digestive system,
eventually leading to the deficiency disease known as scurvy
(a form of avitaminosis), which results in illness and death
if consumption of vitamin C is not resumed in time.
Acute scurvy
Acute scurvy is characterized by:
easy
bruising, or bruising with no apparent cause
loose teeth
superficial bleeding
fragility of blood vessels
poor healing
compromised immunity
mild anemia
Leading to massive internal hemorrhaging, scurvy is eventually
fatal, and was a common condition among sailors and during
winter. Acute scurvy is now very rare in industrialized
countries.
Daily requirements and dose dependant effects
There is continuing debate within the scientific community
over the best dose schedule (the amount and frequency of
intake) of Vitamin C for maintaining optimal health in humans.[1]
Government agency recommended intake levels
A balanced diet without supplementation contains enough
Vitamin C to prevent acute scurvy in an average healthy
adult. For people who smoke, those under stress, and pregnant
women it takes slightly more.
Recommendations
for vitamin C intake have been set by various national agencies
as follows:
40
mg per day: Food Standards Agency (UK) [2]
60–95
mg per day, Dietary Reference Intake (DRI), Recommended
Daily Allowance (RDA), U.S. Food and Nutrition Board 2004
[3].
Independent dose recommendations
Some scientists have criticised governmental agency dose
recommendations on the following grounds.[citation needed]
They
don't take into account individual differences such as age,
weight, etc. For example, heavier individuals generally
need more vitamin C.
The figures represent the amount needed to prevent the acute
form of deficiency disease, while subclinical levels of
the disease are not even acknowledged.
The amount needed to prevent other diseases is not considered.
Optimal health is not a consideration, as the level of health
targeted is that which is marginally better than that which
is considered malnourished.
Some researchers have calculated the amount needed for an
adult human to achieve similar blood serum levels as Vitamin
C synthesising mammals as follows:
6000-18000
mg per day – Linus Pauling's daily recommendation
6000-12000 mg per day – Thomas Levy, Colorado Integrative
Medical Centre recommendation.
3000 mg per day or more during illness or pregnancy (up
to 300g for some illnesses) – Vitamin C Foundation's recommendation.
[5]
400 mg per day – Linus Pauling Institute & US National
Institutes of Health (NIH) Recommendation.
from 3000 mg to 200,000 mg per day based on a protocol described
by Robert Cathcart [4] known as a vitamin C flush wherin
escalating doses of Vitamin C are given until diarrhea develops,
then choosing the highest dose that does not cause diarrhea
(bowel tolerance threshold). High doses (thousands of mg)
may result in diarrhea, which is harmless if the dose is
reduced immediately. Some researchers[4] claim the onset
of diarrhea to be an indication of where the body’s true
vitamin C requirement lies. Both Cathcart[4] and Cameron
have demonstrated that very sick patients with cancer or
influenza do not display any evidence of diarrhea at all
until ascorbate intake reaches levels as high as 200 grams
(½ pound).
However, the biological halflife for vitamin C is quite
short, about 30 minutes in blood plasma, a fact which NIH
and IM researchers have failed to recognize. NIH researchers
established the current RDA based upon tests conducted 12
hours (24 half lives) after consumption. "To be blunt,"
says Hickey, "the NIH gave a dose of vitamin C, waited
until it had been excreted, and then measured blood levels."[6]
There
is a strong advocacy movement for large doses of Vitamin
C (see Advocacy arguments below), although not all purported
benefits are supported by the medical establishment. Many
pro-Vitamin C organizations promote usage levels well beyond
the current Dietary Reference Intake (DRI).
Therapeutic applications and doses
Vitamin C is needed in the diet to prevent scurvy, however,
from the time it became available in pure form in the 1930s,
some practitioners experimented with vitamin C as a treatment
for diseases other than scurvy. Most notable was Fred R.
Klenner, a doctor in general practice in Reidsville, North
Carolina. He utilized both oral and intravenous vitamin
C to treat a wide range of infections and poisons. He published
a paper in 1949 that described how he had seen poliomyelitis
yield to vitamin C in sufficiently large doses.
[edit]
Heart disease
Vitamin C is the main of the three ingredients in Linus
Pauling's patented cure for heart disease, the other two
being the amino acid lysine and nicotinic acid (a form of
Vitamin B3).
Viral diseases, and poisons
Orthomolecular medicine and a minority of scientific opinion
sees vitamin C as being a low cost and safe way to treat
viral disease and to deal with a wide range of poisons.
Vitamin
C has a growing reputation for being useful in the treatment
of colds and flu, owing to its recommendation by prominent
biochemist Linus Pauling. In the years since Pauling's popular
books about vitamin C, general agreement by medical authorities
about larger than RDA amounts of vitamin C in health and
medicine has remained elusive. Ascorbate usage in studies
of up to several grams per day, however, have been associated
with decreased cold duration and severity of symptoms, possibly
as a result of an antihistamine effect [7]. The highest
dose treatments, published clinical results of specific
orthomolecular therapy regimes pioneered by Drs. Klenner
(repeated IV treatments, 400-700+ mg/kg/day [8][9]) and
Cathcart (oral use to bowel tolerance[4], up to ~150 grams
ascorbate per day for flu, have remained experimentally
unaddressed by conventional medical authorities for decades.
The
Vitamin C Foundation recommends an initial usage of up to
8 grams of vitamin C every 20-30 minutes [10] in order to
show an effect on the symptoms of a cold infection that
is in progress. Most of the studies showing little or no
effect employ doses of ascorbate such as 100 mg to 500 mg
per day, considered "small" by vitamin C advocates.
Equally importantly, the plasma half life of high dose ascorbate
is approximately 30 minutes, which implies that most high
dose studies have been methodologically defective and would
be expected to show a minimum benefit. Clinical studies
of divided dose supplementation, predicted on pharmacological
grounds to be effective, have only rarely been reported
in the literature. Essentially all the claims for high dose
vitamin C remain to be scientifically refuted. The clinical
effectiveness of large and frequent doses of vitamin C is
an open scientific question.
In
2002 a meta-study into all the published research on effectiveness
of ascorbic acid in the treatment of infectious disease
and toxins was conducted, by Thomas Levy, Medical Director
of the Colorado Integrative Medical Centre in Denver. He
claimed that evidence exists for its therapeutic role in
a wide range of viral infections and for the treatment of
snake bites.
Lead
poisoning
There is also evidence that Vitamin C is useful in preventing
lead poisoning, possibly helping to chelate the toxic heavy
metal from the body. [11]
Cancer
In 2005 in vitro research by the National Institutes of
Health indicated that Vitamin C administered in pharmacological
concentrations (i.e. intravenous) was preferentially toxic
to several strains of cancer cells. The authors noted: "These
findings give plausibility to intravenous ascorbic acid
in cancer treatment, and have unexpected implications for
treatment of infections where H2O2 may be beneficial."
This research appeared to support Linus Pauling's claims
that Vitamin C can be used to fight cancer [5]
Cataracts
It has been also suggested that Vitamin C might prevent
the formation of cataracts. [6]
Other effects
Contraindications
The U.S. Dietary Reference Intake Tolerable Upper Intake
Level (UL) for a 25-year old male is 2,000 mg/day. Vitamin
C is recognized to be one of the least toxic substances
known to medicine. Its LD50 for rats is 11,900 mg kg-1 [12],
[13], [14].
A
primary concern is people with unusual or unaddressed iron
overload conditions, including hemochromatosis. Vitamin
C enhances iron absorption. If sufferers of iron overload
conditions take gram sized doses of Vitamin C, they may
worsen the iron overload due to enhanced iron absorption.
Inadequate Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme (G6PD)
levels, a genetic condition, may predispose some individuals
to hemolytic anemia after intake of specific oxidizing substances
present in some food and drugs. This includes repeated,
very large intravenous or oral dosages of vitamin C. There
is a test available for G6PD deficiency [15]. High dose
Vitamin E has been proposed as a potential protective factor.
Side-effects
Vitamin C causes diarrhea in everyone if taken in quantities
beyond a limit which is variable to the individual. Cathcart[4]
has called this limit the Bowel Tolerance Limit and observed
that it is higher in people with serious illness than those
in good health. It ranges from 5 to 25 grams per day in
healthy individuals to 300 grams per day in the seriously
ill persons, such as those with AIDS and cancer. The diarrhea
side-effect is harmless though it can be inconvenient. The
diarrhea will cease as soon as the dose is reduced. The
dose required to induce diarrhea increases as the person
gets used to (tolerant to) taking vitamin C (or if his tolerance
increases due to illness as explained above). Thus, the
dose can be increased gradually without inducing the runs.
Large doses of vitamin C may cause acid indigestion (stomach
upset), particularly when taken on an empty stomach. This
unpleasant but harmless side-effect can be avoided by taking
the vitamin along with meals, or by offsetting its acidity
by taking an antacid such as baking soda.
Alleged harmful effects
Reports of harmful effects of vitamin C tend to receive
great prominence in the world's media. As such, these reports
tend to generate much debate and more research into Vitamin
C. Some of the harmful effects described below have been
proven to be unfounded in later studies, while other effects
are still undergoing further analysis.
In
April 1998 the journal Nature reported alleged carcinogenic
and teratogenic effects of excessive doses of vitamin C.
The effects were noted in test tube experiments and on only
two of the 20 markers of free radical damage to DNA. They
have not been supported by further evidence from living
organisms. [7]
In April 2000, University of Southern California researchers
reported a thickening of the arteries of the neck in persons
taking high vitamin C doses. It was later pointed out by
vitamin C advocates that this can be explained by vitamin
C's collagen synthesising role leading to thicker and stronger
artery walls. (ref.6 para 10)
In June 2004, Duke University researchers reported an increased
susceptibility to osteo-arthritis in guinea pigs fed a diet
high in vitamin C. However, a 2003 study at Umeå University
in Sweden, found that "the plasma levels of vitamin
C, retinol and uric acid were inversely correlated to variables
related to rheumatoid arthritis disease activity."
A speculated increased risk of kidney stones may be a side
effect of taking Vitamin C in larger than normal amounts.
The potential mechanism of action is through the metabolism
of Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) to dehydroascorbic acid, which
is then metabolized to oxalic acid, a known constituent
of kidney stones. However, this issue is still controversial,
with evidence being presented for [8] and against [9] the
possibility of this side effect. Vitamin B6 may mitigate
this risk by decreasing oxalate production [10]. Additionally,
thiamine may inhibit oxalate formation. Furthermore, correcting
any magnesium deficiency [11] may decrease the risk of kidney
stones by decreasing oxalate crystallization. Increasing
one's fluid intake also helps to preventing oxalate crystallization
in the kidney.
"Rebound scurvy" is a theoretical, never observed,
condition that could occur when daily intake of Vitamin
C is rapidly reduced from a very large amount to a relatively
low amount. Advocates suggest this is an exaggeration of
the rebound effect which occurs because ascorbate-dependent
enzyme reactions continue for 24-48 hours after intake is
lowered, and use up vitamin C which is not being replenished.
The effect is to lower one's serum vitamin C blood concentration
to less than normal for a short amount of time. During this
period of time there is a slight risk of cold or flu infection
through reduced resistance. Within a couple of days the
enzyme reactions shut down and blood serum returns to the
normal level of someone not taking large supplements. This
is not scurvy, which takes weeks of zero vitamin C consumption
to produce symptoms. It is something people who take large
vitamin C supplements need to be aware of in order to gradually
reduce dosage rather than quit taking Vitamin C suddenly.
(ref.6 para 4) This is a theoretical risk for those taking
supplements - e.g. if they find themselves severely ill,
and in a hospital without the supplements, at a time when
they need normal or better levels of vitamin C to fight
the disease (ref.[4] and search for "The major problem").
At this time, many doctors and hospital staff do not know
much about nor administer megadosing of supplements, so
that patients may have to rely on friends or relatives to
bring them their supplements.
Some writers [12] have identified a theoretical risk of
poor Copper absorption from high doses of Vitamin C, although
little experimental evidence supports this. However, ceruloplasmin
levels seem specifically lowered by high vitamin C intake.
In one study, 600 milligrams of Vitamin C daily did not
decrease copper absorption or overall body copper status
in young men, but led to lower ceruloplasmin levels similar
to those caused by copper deficiency [13]. In another, ceruloplasmin
levels were significantly reduced [14].
There are stories circulating among some folk remedy proponants
that doses of around 12 grams per day of Vitamin C can induce
an abortion in women under 4 weeks of pregnancy. [15] This
is not supported by scientific research however. [16]
Recent studies into the use of both Vitamin E and C as possible
help in preventing oxidative stress leading to pre-eclampsia
has failed to show any benefit,[17] but did increase the
rate of babies born with a low birthweight in one study.[18]
Sources of vitamin C
Vitamin C is obtained through the diet by the vast majority
of the world's population. It is present in mother's milk
but not cow's milk, (because calves produce their own vitamin
C in their liver). The richest natural sources are fruits
and vegetables, and of those, the camu camu fruit and the
billygoat plum contain the highest concentration of the
vitamin. It is also present in some cuts of meat, especially
liver. Vitamin C is the most widely taken nutritional supplement
and is available in a variety of forms from tablets and
drink mixes to pure ascorbic acid crystals in capsules or
as plain powder.
Plant sources
Rose hips are a particularly rich source of vitamin CCitrus
fruits (orange, lemon, grapefruit, lime), tomatoes, and
potatoes are good common sources of vitamin C. Other foods
that are good sources of vitamin C include papaya, broccoli,
brussels sprouts, black currants, strawberries, cauliflower,
spinach, cantaloupe, kiwifruit, cranberries and red peppers.
Emblica
officinalis often referred to as Indian gooseberry, is one
of the richest known sources of vitamin C (720 mg/100g of
fresh pulp or up to 900 mg/100g of pressed juice.)– it contains
30 times the amount found in oranges.
The
amount of vitamin C in foods of plant origin depends on:
the
precise variety of the plant,
the soil condition
the climate in which it grew,
the length of time since it was picked,
the storage conditions,
the method of preparation. Cooking in particular is often
said to destroy vitamin C - but see the section on Food
preparation.
The following table is approximate and shows the relative
abundance in different raw plant sources. The amount is
given in miligrams per 100 grams of fruit or vegetable (in
comparison, one teaspoon of pure vitamin C weighs 4,500
miligrams)...
Plant
source Amount
Billy Goat plum 3150
Camu Camu 2800
Wolfberry 2500
Rose hip 2000
Acerola 1600
Amla 720
Seabuckthorn 600
Jujube 500
Baobab 400
Blackcurrant 200
Red pepper 190
Parsley 130
Guava 100
Kiwifruit 90
Broccoli 90
Loganberry 80
Redcurrant 80
Brussels sprouts 80
Lychee 70
Persimmon 60
Papaya 60
Plant source Amount
Strawberry 60
Orange 50
Lemon 40
Melon, cantaloupe 40
Cauliflower 40
Grapefruit 30
Raspberry 30
Tangerine 30
Mandarin orange 30
Passion fruit 30
Spinach 30
Cabbage raw green 30
Lime 20
Mango 20
Melon, honeydew 20
Tomato 10
Blueberry 10
Pineapple 10
Pawpaw 10
Grape 10
Plant source Amount
Apricot 10
Plum 10
Watermelon 10
Banana 9
Carrot 9
Avocado 8
Crabapple 8
Peach 7
Apple 6
Blackberry 6
Beetroot 5
Pear 4
Lettuce 4
Cucumber 3
Eggplant 2
Fig 2
Bilberry 1
Horned melon 0.5
Medlar 0.3
Animal sources
Goats and most animals make their own vitamin CThe overwhelming
majority of species of animals and plants synthesise their
own vitamin C. It is therefore not a vitamin for them. Synthesis
is achieved through a sequence of 4 enzyme driven steps,
which convert glucose to ascorbic acid. It is carried out
either in the kidneys, in reptiles and birds, or the liver,
in mammals and perching birds. The last enzyme in the process,
l-gulonolactone oxidase, cannot be made by humans because
the gene for this enzyme is defective. The loss of an enzyme
concerned with ascorbic acid synthesis has occurred quite
frequently in evolution and has affected most fish; many
birds; some bats; guinea pigs; and most primates, including
humans. The mutations have not been lethal because ascorbic
acid is so prevalent in the surrounding food sources (it
may be noted that many of these species' diet consists largely
of fruit).
For
example an adult goat will manufacture more than 13,000
mg of vitamin C per day in normal health and as much as
100,000 mg daily when faced with life-threatening disease,
trauma or stress.
Trauma
or injury has been demonstrated to use up large quantities
of vitamin C in animals, including humans.
It
was only realised in the 1920s that some cuts of meat and
fish are also a source of vitamin C for humans. The muscle
and fat which make up the modern western diet are however
poor sources. As with fruit and vegetables cooking degrades
the vitamin C content.
The
following table shows the relative abundance of vitamin
C in various foods of animal origin, given in mg of vitamin
C per 100 grams of food:
Food
Amount
Calf liver (raw) 36
Beef liver (raw) 31
Oysters (raw) 30
Cod roe (fried) 26
Pork liver (raw) 23
Lamb brain (boiled) 17
Chicken liver (fried) 13
Lamb liver (fried) 12
Lamb heart (roast) 11
Food Amount
Lamb tongue (stewed) 6
Human milk (fresh) 4
Goat milk (fresh) 2
Cow milk (fresh) 2
Beef steak (fried) 0
Hen's egg (raw) 0
Pork bacon (fried) 0
Calf veal cutlet (fried) 0
Chicken leg (roast) 0
Food
preparation
It is important to choose a suitable method of food preparation
that conserves vitamin C content. When cooking vegetables,
one should seek to minimize temperature and duration of
cooking and not discard water used in preparation (e.g.,
by steam cooking or by making soup). Food source vitamin
C is identical to that in supplements. The structure of
vitamin C is well understood, see ascorbic acid, and there
is no difference in benefit between natural and synthetic
forms (although fruits and vegetables contain various other
nutrients, and vitamin C is not their only health benefit).
Recent
observations suggest that the impact of temperature and
cooking on vitamin C may have been overestimated:
Since
it is water soluble, vitamin C will strongly leach into
the cooking water while cooking most vegetables — but this
doesn't necessarily mean the vitamin is destroyed — it's
still there, but it's in the cooking water. (This may also
suggest how the apparent misconception about the extent
to which boiling temperatures destroy vitamin C might have
been the result of flawed research: If the vitamin C content
of vegetables (and not of the water) was measured subsequent
to cooking them, then that content would have been much
lower, though the vitamin has not actually been destroyed.)
Not only the temperature, but also the exposure time is
significant. Contrary to what was previously and is still
commonly assumed, it can take much longer than two or three
minutes to destroy vitamin C at boiling point.
It also appears that cooking doesn't necessarily leach vitamin
C in all vegetables at the same rate; it has been suggested
that the vitamin is not destroyed when boiling broccoli[19].
This may be a result of vitamin C leaching into the cooking
water at a slower rate from this vegetable.
Copper
pots will destroy the vitamin.[20]
Vitamin
C enriched teas and infusions have increasingly appeared
on supermarket shelves. Such products would be nonsense
if boiling temperatures did indeed destroy vitamin C at
the rate it had previously been suggested. It should be
noted however that as of 2004 most academics not directly
involved in vitamin C research still teach that boiling
temperatures will destroy vitamin C very rapidly.
Vitamin C supplements
Vitamin C is the most widely taken dietary supplement. [21]
It is available in many forms including tablets, capsules,
drink mix packets, in multi-vitamin formulations and as
chemically pure crystaline powder. Tablet and capsule sizes
range from 25mg to 1500mg. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) crystals
are typically available in bottles containing 300g to 1kg
of powder (a teaspoon of vitamin C crystals equals 4,500mg).
Methods of manufacture (artificial chemical synthesis)
Vitamin C is produced from glucose by two main routes. The
Reichstein process developed in the 1930s uses a single
pre-fermentation followed by a purely chemical route. The
more modern Two-Step fermentation process was originally
developed in China in the 1960s, uses additional fermentation
to replace part of the later chemical stages. Both processes
yield approximately 60% vitamin C from the glucose feed.
Research
is underway at the Scottish Crop Research Institute to create
yeast micro organisms to synthesise ascorbic acid in a single
fermentation step, a technology which is expected to reduce
manufacturing costs considerably. [22]
World
production of synthesised vitamin C is currently estimated
at approximately 110,000 tonnes annually. Main producers
today are BASF/Takeda, Roche, Merck and the China Pharmaceutical
Group Ltd. of the People's Republic of China. China is slowly
becoming the major world supplier as its prices undercut
those of the US and European manufacturers. [23]
Discovery and history
The need to include fresh plant food or raw animal flesh
in the diet to prevent disease was known from ancient times.
Native peoples living in marginal areas incorporated this
into their medicinal lore. For example, infusions of spruce
needles were used in the temperate zones, or the leaves
from species of drought-resistant trees in desert areas.
In 1536, the French explorer Jacques Cartier, exploring
the St. Lawrence River, used the local natives' knowledge
to save his men who were dying of scurvy. He boiled the
needles of the arbor vitae tree to make a tea that was later
shown to contain 50 mg of vitamin C per 100 grams.
Through
history the benefit of plant food for the survival of sieges
and long sea voyages was recommended by enlightened authorities.
John Woodall, the first appointed surgeon to the British
East India Company, recommended the use of lemon juice as
a preventive and cure in his book "The Surgeon's Mate"
of 1617. The Dutch writer, Johann Bachstrom of Leyden, in
1734, gave the firm opinion that "scurvy is solely
owing to a total abstinence from fresh vegetable food, and
greens; which is alone the primary cause of the disease."
Citrus fruits were one of the first sources of vitamin C
available to ship's surgeons.The first attempt to give scientific
basis for the cause of scurvy was by a ship's surgeon in
the British Royal Navy, James Lind. While at sea in May
1747, Lind provided some crew members with two oranges and
one lemon per day, in addition to normal rations, while
others continued on cider, vinegar or sea water, along with
their normal rations. In the history of science this is
considered to be the first example of a controlled experiment
comparing results on two populations of a factor applied
to one group only with all other factors the same. The results
conclusively showed that citrus fruits prevented the disease.
Lind wrote up his work and published it in 1753, in Treatise
on the Scurvy.
Lind's
work was slow to be noticed, partly because he gave conflicting
evidence within the book and partly because of social inertia
in some elements at the British admiralty who saw care for
the well-being of ships' crew as a sign of weakness. There
was also the fact that fresh fruit was very expensive to
keep on board, whereas boiling it down to juice allowed
easy storage but destroyed the vitamin. Ships' captains
assumed wrongly that it didn't work, because the juice failed
to cure scurvy.
It
was 1795 before the British navy adopted lemons or lime
as standard issue at sea. (This practice led to the nickname
limey for British people, especially British sailors.) Captain
James Cook had previously demonstrated and proven the principle
of the advantages of fresh and preserved foods, such as
sauerkraut, by taking his crews to the Hawaiian islands
and beyond without losing any of his men to scurvy. For
this otherwise unheard of feat, he was awarded a medal by
the British Admiralty. So the Navy was certainly well aware
of the principle. The cost of providing fresh fruit on board
was probably a factor in this long delay. Luxuries or non-standard
supplies not provided by the Admiralty were usually provided
by the Captains.
The
name "antiscorbutic" was used in the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries as general term for those foods
known to prevent scurvy, even though there was no understanding
of the reason for this. These foods include lemons, limes,
and oranges; sauerkraut, salted cabbage, malt, and portable
soup were employed with variable effect.
In
1907, Axel Holst and Theodor Frølich, two Norwegian
biochemists studying beriberi contracted aboard ship's crews
in the Norwegian Fishing Fleet, wanted a small test mammal
to substitute for the pigeons they used. They fed guinea
pigs the test diet, which had earlier produced beriberi
in their pigeons, and were surprised when scurvy resulted
instead. Until that time scurvy had not been observed in
any organism apart from humans, and it was considered an
exclusively human disease.
In
the early twentieth century, the Polish-American scientist
Casimir Funk conducted research into deficiency diseases,
and in 1912 Funk developed the concept of vitamins, for
the elements in food which are essential to health. Then,
from 1928 to 1933, the Hungarian research team of Joseph
L Svirbely and Albert Szent-Györgyi and, independently,
the American Charles Glen King, first isolated vitamin C
and showed it to be ascorbic acid.
In
1928 the arctic anthropologist and adventurer Vilhjalmur
Stefansson attempted to prove his theory of how Eskimo (Inuit)
people are able to avoid scurvy with almost no plant food
in their diet. This had long been a puzzle because the disease
had struck European Arctic explorers living on similar high-meat
diets. Stefansson theorised that the native peoples of the
Arctic got their vitamin C from fresh meat that was raw
or minimally cooked. Starting in February 1928, for one
year he and a colleague lived on an animal-flesh-only diet
under medical supervision at New York's Bellevue Hospital;
they remained healthy.
In
1933-1934, the British chemists Sir Walter Norman Haworth
and Sir Edmund Hirst and, independently, the Polish Tadeus
Reichstein, succeeded in synthesizing the vitamin, the first
to be artificially produced. This made possible the cheap
mass production of vitamin C. Haworth was awarded the 1937
Nobel Prize for Chemistry largely for this work. The synthetic
form of the vitamin is identical to the natural form.
The
Swiss pharmaceutical company Hoffmann-La Roche was the first
to mass produce synthetic vitamin C, under the brand name
of Redoxon, in 1934.
In
1959 the American J.J. Burns showed that the reason some
mammals were susceptible to scurvy was the inability of
their liver to produce the active enzyme L-gulonolactone
oxidase, which is the last of the chain of four enzymes
which synthesize ascorbic acid.
American
biochemist Irwin Stone was the first to exploit Vitamin
C for its food preservative properties and held patents
on this. He developed the theory that vitamin C was an essential
nutrient deficient in humans as a result of a genetic defect
that afflicted the whole human race.
Vitamin
C hypothesis
Since its discovery Vitamin C has been considered a universal
panacea by some, although this led to suspicions of it being
overhyped by others.
The
fact that man possesses three of the four enzymes that animals
employ to manufacture ascorbates in relatively large amounts,
has led researchers such as Irwin Stone and Linus Pauling
to hypothesize that man's ancestors once manufactured this
substance in the body millions of years ago in quantities
roughly estimated at 3,000-4,000 mg daily, but later lost
the ability to do this through a chance of evolution. If
true, this would mean that vitamin C was misnamed as a vitamin
and is in fact a vital macronutrient like fat or carbohydrate.[citation
needed]
Dr.
Hickey, of Manchester Metropolitan University, believes
that man carries a mutated and ineffective form of the genetic
machinery for manufacturing the fourth of the four enzymes
used by all mammals to make ascorbic acid. Cosmic rays or
a retro virus could have caused this mutation, millions
of years ago.[citation needed] In humans the three surviving
enzymes continue to produce the precursors to ascorbic acid
but the process is incomplete and the body then disassembles
them.
In
the 1960s Nobel-Prize winning chemist Linus Pauling, after
contact with Irwin Stone, began actively promoting vitamin
C as a means to greatly improve human health and resistance
to disease. His book How to Live Longer and Feel Better
was a bestseller and advocated taking more than 10,000 milligrams
per day. It sold widely and many advocates today see its
influence as the reason there was a marked downward trend
in US heart disease from the early 1980s onwards.
Stone's
work also informed the practise of Dr. Robert F. Cathcart
III, in the 1970s and 1980s. He applied extremely large
doses of ascorbate (300 grams = 0.66 pounds per day) to
a wide range of viral diseases with successful results.
Cathcart developed the concept of Bowel tolerance, the use
of the onset of diarrhea as an indication of when the body's
true requirement of ascorbic acid had been reached. He found
that seriously ill people could often tolerate levels of
tens of grams per day before their tolerance limit is reached.
Matthias
Rath is a controversial German physician who once worked
with Pauling. He is an active proponent and publicist for
high dose vitamin C. He has published a theory that deaths
from scurvy in humans during the ice age, when vitamin C
was scarce, selected for individuals who could repair arteries
with a layer of cholesterol. He theorises that, although
eventually harmful, cholesterol lining of artery walls,
would be beneficial in that it would keep the individual
alive until access to Vitamin C allowed arterial damage
to be repaired. Atherosclerosis is thus a vitamin c deficiency
disease. Rath has also argued publically that high doses
of vitamin C can be effectively used against viral epidemics
such as HIV, SARS and bird flu. [24] [25].
It
has been suggested by some advocates that ascorbic acid
is really a food group in its own right like carbohydrates
or protein and should not be seen as a pharmaceutical or
vitamin at all.[citation needed]
Chronic
scurvy
Identified and named by Linus Pauling, "chronic scurvy"
or "subclinical scurvy" is a condition of Vitamin
C deficiency which is not as easily noticeable as acute
scurvy (because chronic scurvy is mostly internal), characterized
by micro lesions of tissues (such as that caused by blood
pulsing through arteries, which stretches the arterial walls
causing them to tear slightly). It is a major contributing
factor to cardio vascular disease. The condition is almost
entirely preventable with supplementation of larger doses
of Vitamin C (8 grams or more per day). Chronic scurvy is
commonplace, even in industrialized countries.
Politics of Vitamin C
The neutrality of this section is disputed.
Please see discussion on the talk page.
There are regulations in most countries which limit the
claims on the treatment of disease that can be placed on
food, drug, and nutrient product labels. The public must
rely on their own research to guide them on the dose of
the Vitamin C they take and the frequency in which they
take it. Regulations include:
Claims
of therapeutic effect with respect to the treatment of any
medical condition or disease are prohibited by the Food
and Drug Administration (in the USA, and by the corresponding
regulatory agencies in other countries) unless the substance
has gone through a lengthy (10+ years) and expensive (200
million US dollars+) approval process, for which the applicant
seeking approval must pay.
In the United States, the following notice is mandatory
on food, drug, and nutrient product labels which make health
claims: These statements have not been evaluated by the
Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended
to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. This statement
must be included even if substantial scientific evidence
exists showing that the message isn't true. This may lead
consumers to the false belief that Vitamin C has no value
in preventing or treating diseases other than scurvy (for
which treatment claims are allowed).
Vitamin C advocates claim the following factors further
affect the marketing and distribution of Vitamin C, and
the dissemination of information concerning the nutrient:
There
is growing evidence of the applications and efficacy of
Vitamin C, but governmental agency dose and frequency of
intake recommendations have remained relatively fixed. This
has lead some researchers to challenge the recommendations.
In 2003 Steve Hickey and Hilary Roberts of the Manchester
Metropolitan University published a fundamental criticism
of the approach taken to fix the nutritional requirement
of vitamin C. They again argued in 2004 that the RDA which
is based on blood plasma and white blood cell saturation
data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was based
on flawed data[26]. According to these authors, the doses
required to achieve blood, tissue and body "saturation"
are much larger than previously believed. They allege that
the Institute of Medicine (IoM) and the NIH have failed
to respond to an open letter from a number of scientists
and medical researchers, notably Doctors Steve Hickey, Hilary
Roberts, Ian Brighthope, Robert Cathcart, Abram Hoffer,
Archie Kalokerinos, Tom Levy, Richard Passwater, Hugh Riordan,
Andrew Saul and Patrick Holford, which called for revision
of the RDI (Reference Daily Intake).
Research and the treatment approval process are so expensive,
pharmaceutical companies rarely apply for approval of an
unpatentable product. To do so without the protection of
a patent would allow competitors to manufacture the product
too, which would drive the price (and profit margin) down
to a point much less disirable than the price point (and
profit margin) of patentable products. The lower price would
also reduce the likelihood of recuperating the company's
exorbitant research funding and treatment approval costs.
Vitamin C is not eligible for patenting because it is a
natural substance, and because it has already been marketed
to the public for some time. As of yet, no company has applied
to the FDA (nor paid) for approval of Vitamin C as a treatment
for any disease.
Companies selling a treatment product are not required to
inform consumers or patients of other treatments, even if
those treatments are more effective, less expensive, and
have fewer side-effects. Medical practitioners are not required
to inform their patients of treatments for which treatment
approval has not been granted. This situation, coupled with
the label censorship explained above makes it more difficult
to keep the public informed about the benefits of and new
discoveries concerning the applications and effective dosage
levels of Vitamin C.
Matthias Rath and others point to low doses of Vitamin C
as the cause of the current epidemics of heart disease and
cancer, and have termed the situation "a genocide",
implying that health care providers (and particularly cardiologists
and pharmaceutical companies) are aware of Vitamin C's benefits
and are deliberately seeking to block its acceptance as
a therapeutic agent. [27] Meanwhile, governments, with their
bureaucratic systems of treatment approval filtering out
natural and inexpensive treatments such as those applying
vitamin C,
See also
Ascorbyl palmitate
Mineral ascorbates
Nutrition
Vitamin
Essential fatty acid
Essential mineral
Exercise
Anti-oxidant
Life extension
Sources
Pauling, Linus (1986) How to Live Longer and Feel Better
W. H. Freeman and Company, ISBN 0-380-70289-4
Levy Thomas (2002). Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and
Toxins. Xlibris Corporation (Paperback). ISBN 1401069630.(Note:
Xlibris is a print on demand self-publishing house.)
Hickey, Steve; Roberts, Hilary (May, 2004) Ascorbate: The
Science of Vitamin C, Lulu Press, Inc. ISBN 1411607244 (Note:
Lulu is a print on demand self-publishing house.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_C